YARA and Sigma Rule Feed
Boost your detection capabilities with the power of thousands of hand-crafted high-quality YARA and Sigma rules.
The database grows by 1,000 to 1,500 rules every year. A subscription includes the curation of old rules. We change and improve around 500 old rules every year.
Our team curates YARA rules in 8 different categories: APT, Hack Tools, Malware, Web Shells, Exploits, Threat Hunting, Anomalies and Third Party. The first five of them can be subscribed, the other three are only used in a compiled and encrypted form in our scanner THOR.
With access to VALHALLA, you can boost your detection by adding most of our highly successful THOR scanners’ signatures to your own scan engines.
All rules are performance optimised and quality tested against terabytes of goodware and other data.
22,000+
quality tested YARA rules
4,000+
handcrafted Sigma rules
1,000+
new rules every year
~500
changed and improved old rules every year
Growth
The rule set grows by 1,000 to 1,500 hand-written and quality tested rules per year.
Delivery
You can download the full subscribed set via web browser or use our public API client written in Python to get a customized rule set that fits your scan engine.
Subscription
We offer subscriptions for each of our rule set categories or the whole curated rule set. Each subscription includes improvements, fixes and updates on the subscribed categories for 12 months.
Performance Optimization
All rules are used in our scanners and therefore optimized for performance. The planned version 1.1 of the API will allow you to pull less strict rule sets that are more effective for in-memory detection and the detection in data streams.
Curation
We improve around 500 old rules per year. These improvements include false positive reductions and the tightening or extension of existing rules.
Trial
Rich Meta Data
Valhalla provides rich meta data that adds valuable context to each match, such as a web reference, related threat group campaigns, hashes of samples for which the rule was initially created and a list of public samples on which the rule has matched so far.
Each rule contains information about the required YARA version and modules to run that rule.
The API client allows you to retrieve only those rules that your product supports.
The rule’s score and tags indicate its reliability and scope. Both can be used to select the perfect rule set for your application.
Web Frontend
The website allows you to immediately retrieve your subscribed rules using nothing but a web browser.
Just insert your API key and click on “Get Rules”.
You can also select the “JSON” checkbox to get them in JSON format or select “DEMO” to test drive this feature with a demo API key, which allows you to retrieve all public YARA or Sigma rules in the selected format.
The website also contains statistics about the current rule set.
Smart API
The Python module allows you download the subscribed categories as text or JSON object. It even has presets for well-known products like FireEye’s appliances, Tenable, Tanium, CarbonBlack or Symantec MAA.
It requires no more than 3 lines of code to retrieve the subscribed rule set:
from valhallaAPI.valhalla import ValhallaAPI v = ValhallaAPI(api_key="Your API Key") response = v.get_rules_text(product="FireEyeEX")
Integration
The web API allows you to retrieve the perfect set that integrates seamlessly with the platform you use. Depending on your use case, we recommend subscriptions for different rule categories.
Note: The feed cannot be downloaded or used on Microsoft Windows or macOS systems.
Command Line Client
The comfortable command line client ‘valhalla-cli’ helps to integrate the rule retrieval into your deployment process.
It’s really as simple as it gets.
It can be installed running the following command:
pip3 install valhallaAPI
The next command retrieves all subscribed rules:
valhalla-cli -k APIKEY
The command line client supports proxy servers and allows you to apply numerous filters, e.g.
- Exclude rules with low scores
(e.g. threat hunting rules with scores lower than 75) - Exclude rules that wouldn’t work on your scan engine (e.g. “Tanium”)
- Retrieve only rules with certain tags
(e.g. “CHINA”, “APT”)
(note: the API key shown in the animated GIF is not valid anymore)
Markus Neis
Swisscom Schweiz AG
YARA Categories:
Subscribable
Special Strengths:
- Rules to detect a variety of offensive security tools and frameworks
- Rules cover the tool itself, output, helper files and special command line parameters to detect their use in log files
Special Strengths:
- High grade rules for malware and tools used by threat groups
- Based on public reports, our own undisclosed threat intel work, threat intel partners, threat exchanges and active incident response cases (mainly Europe, Asia and the Middle East)
Special Strengths:
- Often very low Antivirus detection ratio
- One of the things most EDRs are unable to detect
YARA Categories:
Only Available in THOR Scanner
Special Strengths:
- Generic rules / heuristic detection methods focus on methods and obfuscation instead of specific threats
- Highly effective in detecting new, yet unknown threats
YARA Categories:
Quantity Comparison
* only in THOR scanner
Frequently Asked Questions
Nextron Sigma Feed
What is the Nextron Sigma Feed?
The Nextron Sigma Feed is a curated commercial feed of Sigma detection rules maintained by Nextron’s Research Team.
It is separate from SigmaHQ. SigmaHQ is a public community project. The Nextron Sigma Feed is focused on curated, operationally useful Sigma detection logic for security monitoring, threat hunting and alerting workflows.
Is the Nextron Sigma Feed the same as SigmaHQ?
The Nextron Sigma Feed is a separate curated feed. It is maintained by Nextron and follows our internal quality, testing and maintenance process.
Why should I use the Nextron Sigma Feed if many Sigma rules are public?
The Nextron Sigma Feed focuses on curated Sigma detection logic. The value is not just the number of Sigma rules. The value is in rule quality, maintenance, useful metadata, reduced noise and detection logic that is written with real operational use in mind.
How does Nextron decide which Sigma rules go into the private Sigma Feed?
This includes behavior-based Sigma rules, carefully researched detection logic, rules with useful metadata and rules that fit our own detection engineering standards.
Some Sigma detections may also be shared publicly, especially when they support community defense against a major current threat. The private Sigma Feed is where we maintain our curated commercial Sigma coverage.
Are private Nextron Sigma rules more complex than public Sigma rules?
Private Nextron Sigma rules are intended to be better curated, better documented, tested more carefully and written with operational use in mind. Some valuable Sigma rules are technically simple, but they detect the right behavior with the right constraints and useful context.
What makes a good Sigma rule?
- it detects meaningful behavior
- it performs well
- it avoids unnecessary false positives
- it includes useful metadata and references
- it is understandable for analysts
- where possible, it detects a technique or behavior pattern, not just a single IOC
For high-confidence Sigma rules, especially High or Critical rules, we expect a much lower false-positive rate than for lower-level hunting or informational rules.
Are Nextron Sigma rules based on public threat reports?
The added value is the research work after that: understanding the broader technique, checking how it appears in telemetry, identifying variants, reducing false positives and turning it into Sigma logic that is not limited to one narrow IOC.
Other Sigma rules come from Nextron’s own research, incident response experience, product telemetry, malware analysis and detection engineering work.
Are Nextron Sigma rules only IOC-based?
It would be easy to turn every filename, hash or domain into a Sigma rule and inflate the feed. That usually creates poor long-term value.
Our focus is on behavior-based Sigma detections where possible. IOC-like Sigma rules can still make sense for short-lived emerging threats, but they should not be the foundation of a high-quality Sigma feed.
What is an example of a long-lasting Sigma detection?
The exact vulnerability, exploit payload or web application may change. The post-exploitation behavior often stays similar: a web server process unexpectedly starts command shells, scripting engines or administrative tools.
That kind of Sigma rule is not tied to one CVE, filename, hash or threat actor. It can detect variants of a broader attack pattern and therefore remains useful longer.
How often is the Nextron Sigma Feed updated?
For important threats, we can react faster when needed. In many cases, existing generic Sigma rules already cover parts of a newly described attack chain before a new threat-specific Sigma rule is created.
How quickly does Nextron react to new threats with Sigma rules?
If a new vulnerability has very specific exploit patterns, a new Sigma rule may require additional research. That can take some time, especially if public information is incomplete or noisy.
However, many attacks include behavior that is already covered by existing generic Sigma rules, for example suspicious process trees, PowerShell abuse, credential access behavior or unusual execution chains.
So the question is not only “how fast can we write a new Sigma rule”, but also “how much of the behavior is already covered by existing generic Sigma logic”.
What do Sigma levels like Critical, High, Medium, Low and Informational mean?
In general:
- Critical Sigma rules should be very high confidence and should not produce regular false positives
- High Sigma rules should usually be monitored closely, sometimes with environment-specific baselining
- Medium Sigma rules often require more context or correlation
- Low and Informational Sigma rules are often useful for dashboards, hunting, trend analysis, correlation or volume-based monitoring
The level should always be interpreted together with the data source, environment, expected volume and rule context.
What does “experimental” mean for a Nextron Sigma rule?
The status is currently handled very conservatively. Some Sigma rules may remain marked as experimental for a long time even though they are already included in the feed and have not shown notable false-positive issues in practice.
We are improving the lifecycle process around Sigma rule status handling so that telemetry and field feedback can be reflected more consistently over time.
How should I evaluate the value of the Nextron Sigma Feed?
Better criteria are:
- detection relevance
- false-positive behavior
- metadata quality
- coverage of useful techniques
- update frequency
- maintenance quality
- analyst context
- operational fit for your telemetry and SIEM
A smaller set of well-maintained Sigma rules is usually more useful than a very large set of noisy or mass-generated rules.
How many Sigma rules are in the Nextron Sigma Feed?
We also provide statistics that show the Sigma Feed distribution by level, category, log source and metadata. This gives a better view of the feed than a single total number.
How fast is the Nextron Sigma Feed growing?
We prefer controlled growth over mass generation. The goal is not to add the largest possible number of Sigma rules, but to maintain useful detection logic that analysts can actually work with.
Can we review example Sigma rules before subscribing?
We prefer curated examples over simply sharing the last few rules chronologically. The last three Sigma rules may be narrow, random or not representative of the feed.
A better sample set usually includes different types of Sigma detections, for example a high-confidence behavior rule, an emerging-threat-style rule and a generic long-lasting detection rule.
Is the Nextron Sigma Feed related to the Valhalla YARA Feed?
The Sigma Feed contains Sigma rules for log and event-based detection.
The YARA Feed contains YARA rules for file, memory and artifact scanning.
Customers should evaluate them separately depending on their use case, telemetry and detection platform.

